Featured reader reviews: Page 1
Listed below are the latest featured reader reviews on the site. Some are positive in praise, some are negative in criticism, but the one thing they all have in common is that they are well written and explain their reasoning. We can never have enough reader reviews as they add to the quality of the site, making it ever more useful for visitors.
I LOVE this book. This book made me travel through a world that I thought I would never like. I had read Meyer's Lunar Chronicles and when I picked up Heartless I didn't know if Meyer would write the same way as she did in the Lunar Chronicles. Oh boy, she surely did. She made me fall deep on love with Catherine. I fell in love with Jest. With the whole world. I felt as if I were Catherine. I gave Heartless a 9 out of 10 because when I finished it, I was completely heartbroken. I was so sad for Cath, and I wanted that happy ending. I think what Meyer did with the end of the book is great, but I'm obviously still going to be sad about it. I fell in love with everything about this book, and I'm still hearbroken about the ending. But in my mind, they both lived a happily ever after. And the ending explained so much about the Queen of Hearts. Yes, Meyer may not have gone with Lewis Carroll's original idea of Alice in Wonderland, but it made me think of that something like this could've happened to the Queen of Hearts in Lewos Carroll's version. All in all, this book was so good I couldn't stop reading it. I'm in love with this book.
I agree with the other reviewers about the originality of the setting and of the magic system. It is a refreshing change, and I also enjoyed the politics - not as intricate, by far, as Game of Thrones, but it definitely adds a dimension to the book. However, I also agree with those reviewers who find the writing and pacing rather ponderous: the book is carried by the plot, not the characters, who are two dimensional even when they are ostensibly complex and self-contradictory: these self-contradicvtions do not seem to lead to much introspection or to any particular twists (though the book *does* have twists, and the ending is very good). Rather, this introspection leads to pages of space filling text whiih adds little to the characters or to the plot. The fights are OK, but a bit repetitive once one has figured out how the allomantic powers work. So, I enjoyed the Final Empire - I needed a good (quick) read -, but am not getting into book 2 (Well of Ascension), probably because I now simply need a good read. I am sure, however, that I'll eventually get round to reading the whole series, as and when I need a little brain candy. To sum up: a good plot-driven read, average writing, highly original setting and magic system, but not a major classic (at least from where I sit!).
Let me start off by saying this book has fantastic writing and really does a good job of creating a world in which these characters live in. Rothfuss is fantastic at setting a scene and writing is really his strong point. The reason I have to give this book such a low rating is because I 1. Cant relate or get into the main character. 2, DENNA DENNA DENNA and 3. This opens too many questions that simply dont get answered as well as has no real main plot to the story. Let me elaborate. 1. Kvothe is just simply too good at everything. He has hardships sure, but he is too smart, too handsome, too quick witted and just too dam powerful. Not to mention he is only 15. This makes it hard to connect with the main character and makes it hard to believe what he is doing as well as he isn't at any risk throughout the story. Sure, he has hard times but he defeats well pretty much anything. 2. Denna and the other females in this story just bug me. I understand this is a story told through Kvothes eyes but why is every female in this world all beautiful and perfect? Also his relationship with Denna is just creepy and fake. Why doesnt he just ask her out..or better yet get with Feyla? 3. The major part of this story that I dont like is that its too vague with everything and asks so many questions that never get answered. It just seems like poor writing. This is not a bad book by any means, its just a bad story.
I really enjoyed the first 2 books in the Stormlight Archive but was really disappointed with Oathbringer. I agree with the reviewer that there were too many side stories and the plot was pulled in way too many diections. I’m also not a fan of super detailed descriptions of mythical planet and references to stuff that has nothing to do with story or characters. Overall I found myself shaking my head throughout the book trying to get to relevant story points.
I just want to tell that these 2 books of the trilogy are just amazing. First few hours I wasn't interested too much (part where Kvothe didn't even start a story, just the inn and so on). But when the real story started, man, I didn't expect so much. In a nutshell, now I'm a fan of the trilogy and waiting for the 3rd book. Also, what I want to emphasize is that this story has many aspects: magic, romantic, traveling, interesting conversation, humor and just our everyday sorrows and joys. 10 out of 10, good job, Patrick.
Well I wouldn’t say it’s poorley written I read The Last Wish first and played the games so I love the story line and perhaps that has helped carry me through this book. Like I said it’s not the writing it’s the long chapters and lack of action. And I’m no fencer but every fight scene involves pirouette after pirouette if you are spinning that much in a fight something’s wrong. I liked this book but I feel like it focuses so much on philosophy and ideology when it should have started building the world that the characters are set in but hey what ever I’ve read way way worse and I’m still going to read the rest.
Unlike some I read the Lord of the Rings out of order. My sister had the Two Towers and I had read everything else in her little library. I liked the cover (clearly a 70's cover) and picked it up with Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas running over the grasslands of Rohan in pursuit of orcs. I read it part way and was so lost I gave it up. But the local library had a copy of all three books. I took up the first book and literally read all three books in a span of 7 days. I didn't sleep. I couldn't. At the end I cried that it was over. I wanted it to go on and on. The world created by J.R.R Tolkien swept me up and has never left me. I read the Hobbit after the LOTR - and watched that evolve from a child's bedtime story to a much deeper, much more nuanced tale. Tolkien created a world of constant challenges to each characters moral and ethical souls. Captivated initially by the primary storyline of Frodo, Aragorn and Gandalf I raced through the book to learn the ending. On subsequent readings I understood the depth of each characters risks and rewards. The Ring presents each prime character with a vision of power capable of giving them their hearts desire with the knowledge the Ring will destroy that which they cherish most in time. Some fail, some overcome. And for some to overcome the lure of the ring is ensure the ending of what they hold most dear. Of all the lines in the Lord of the Rings the one that rings over and over to me is Galadriel who when she she refuses the Ring offered by Frodo says: "I pass the test. I will diminish and go into the west." She knows in refusing she has doomed her beloved Lothlorien but to accept she becomes the very thing she opposes. That is a terrible choice. The Lord of the Rings has a depth no other novel I have ever read has. I devoured the appendices at the end of the book. I find myself going back to read them periodically. I don't think it is for everybody - but those of us lucky few who fall into the LOTR completely it is a world that is always with us, always a comfort and cautionary.
Robin Hobb writes in a genre that often lacks depth and nuance. She brings to life incredibly complex characters, who often don't have a lot go well for them, and yet somehow manages to maintain interest and excitement over the course of hundreds of pages. Renegade's Magic is no exception here. This book is also fascinating, as it is written in first person point of view, from the perspective of a person who does not have control of the body he inhabits. It sounds odd, but she does this seamlessly. As with the last few books of the Farseer series, these books at times transcend the genre and are really works of high art. They probably would have been a bit boring for me 15 years ago, and thus I wouldn't recommend it across the board. but as a long time fantasy reader who is not a bit older, I would rate this series as one of the best I have ever read. In my opinion, this series, along with the final Farseer trilogy, make Robin Hobb one of the best authors the fantasy genre has ever seen, and certainly one of my all time favourites.
Having read all three installments of the "Endgame" I can see how similarly the plot follows along the story of "The Hunger games". However, it is brilliantly written in it's own right and must not be regarded as a rip-off. Readers of dystopian fantasy novels will find that this is a thrilling read. One one thing that sets it apart from the hunger games is that the story is not centered around a main character but rather told in the perspective of all the important characters that make the plot move forward. Begin the book, choose a character, and see how long your character of choice will last in the story. The characters are also culturally diverse, and it is not impossible for readers to find one they can most relate to. The way the scenes are portrayed capture raw emotion and really solidifies each characters' motive in playing the game. This story is not about protagonists and antagonists. This story is about survival.
Daniel from Israel has pretty much summed it up for me, just go read his review (call me lazy). The way Perry does everything right and is generally a weird combination of smug and utterly amoral in a world of alien monsters that actually eat people (his 5 minutes of upset after the stomping episode just makes it worse) is annoying. The amoral thing is the worst bit. He isn't introduced as a military man but just buys into everything without any critical thoughts or feelings. Also, every character that doesn't fit into that weird viewpoint is treated as a lampooned fool who gets death as a result and it's all they deserved anyway. Now if you feel like laughing at my opinions and saying "Idiot! It's a satire!" then it's the crappiest satire I've read for a long time. If you're going to do that you need to nail it, and this absolutely does not.