I have been reading and reviewing books for nigh on seven years now, and in that time I believe I have noticed a creeping trend migrating from the world of comic books, infiltrating the world of genre literature. No longer is a book written solely for the purpose of entertaining a hoped-for reader, rather, some authors view the book-stage of their stories as simply a convenient stepping stone towards the glitz and glamour of Hollywood and big-budget movie deals.
The first I heard of Erika Johansen’s ‘The Queen of the Tearling’ was news that Emma Watson (of Harry Potter fame) was championing the cause of a movie based on the novel. She will not only star as the main character in the movie, but she is taking on the responsibility as one of the producers for the film as well.
Understandably, given my love of all things Emma Watson, I wanted to know more about this book she so loved. The blurb seemed interesting enough, and while I was a little nervous of finding myself reading yet another ‘Hunger Games’/’Twilight’/’The Bone Season’, I wanted to make the decision for myself.
Sadly, I found myself working very hard to keep reading this book, and by the end I was left disappointed – as if I hadn’t actually had the opportunity to read a new book, but rather just the screenplay for an upcoming movie, with all the plot holes and two-dimensional characterisations you’d expect.
To be clear, I think that The Queen of the Tearling is going to make a terrific movie! It has everything you’d want for a teen-drama-fantasy: Nineteen year old girl is the long-hidden queen; She has no experience of the wider world, and falls inexplicably for the obviously dark and brooding criminal; She makes decisions based almost entirely from her heart, and only seems to be cross-examined well after such opinions would have been useful; She’s ‘plain’ looking, but kicks ass!
But as a book, there is much missing. Character development is relatively non-existent, and I’m left feeling as if I should have been rooting for the main character, but without any reason why. Everything felt very as-expected, with very little in the way of twists and turns to keep the reader interested beyond the next chapter. And when something couldn’t be legitimately told from the main-characters point of view, Johansen just skips to someone else for a few moments, lazily filling in information that will be needed to understand the protagonist’s later events.
Robin Hobb is the master of telling a story from only one characters point of view, without having to resort to spur-of-the-moment POV changes to fill in the story. The answer is not to avoid POV swaps, but rather to either commit to them or not – you can’t just dangle in the middle.
There are genuinely interesting plot-points at work here, but in almost every instance they are executed with a somewhat lack-lustre feel – as if hoping an actor will be able to convey the relevant emotions. The trope of the long-hidden queen is dealt with well, in a way that exceeds the written pitch. Her looks are plain, and remain so throughout the book – a genuine surprise, as I was waiting for someone to take her glasses off (ok, she doesn’t wear glasses), and toss her hair about and lo and behold!
The references to our culture are disconcerting without any context as to why Lord of the Rings or Rowling should exist in this narrative, and by the end we are no closer to understanding the veiled hints to America and Europe. Where does this story take place? What’s the history? Are the references to Earth names and places relevant?
In the end, I wouldn’t steer someone away from reading The Queen of the Tearling if the blurb catches your fancy (or, if you’re like me, you have an unresolved crush on Emma Watson), but I’m not going to go out of my way to secure copies for you either. In the end, it was a mediocre book that I’m glad to have read, and glad to have put behind me.
Review by Joshua S Hill
Dumb from USA
I liked this book actually. Why, you ask do I give it a 1? Because I read all three and the final book was so terrible I can't think of any book I have ever read being so bad. It ruined the entire story. The author should slit her wrists and save us from anymore of her drivil. Emma Watson will probably slit her wrists when she reads the last book also. Everyone goes to hell and none of the series happened. The red queen should have won and fucked the whole kingdom then at least everyone would have good sex. Christ that sucked. Read the rage rants of these. I don't give a shit about my spelling of this review, why should I? Who cares? Idiotic. Poor Emma Watson. What a mess.
Annelise from Canada
If you're reading this review, you should know I completely disagree with the reviews above. To me, it's a very well developed and thought out series. If you stop after the first book, you're depriving yourself of the full story. Then again, if you didn't like the first one, why should you keep reading. The purpose, after all, is to entertain, is it not? Two major points I wish to address. First, the switching of the POV. The story is primarily Kelsea's story. But not only. It is the story of a people and the questions: is it possible to have a truly utopian society? Or a society started with an idealistic leader? Can we maintain that society? Or is human nature too flawed to do so? Where does it all go wrong? Robin Hobb is masterful, I agree. But her story is told from one character's story because it is HIS story. That is not the case here. Kelsea is merely a small part in a much larger picture and the story needs the different POVs to demonstrate that. Second, the two dimensional characters. The Queen of the Tearling is not meant to be a beginning middle and end. It is a beginning. To see the development that the above author so longs for, I believe they need to read second and third books. Erika Johansen does not set out to solve problems easily. She sets out to make her characters, and by extension, the reader, work for change. Nothing that is good comes easily. Therefore, things unfold gradually in this story. You have to be patient to get the reward.
Becky from USA
I think this book committed my cardinal sin for books: It was quite boring in many places. I read it because of all of the hype, but found it to be mediocre as well with periods of "very dull indeed" throughout.
Alejandra from Mexico
I actually read the book for the very same reason as you. I follow Emma Watson's career, so obviously if I could get a sneak peek at an upcoming role for her I would. This review is actually pretty accurate to my opinion, down to the point where I think it will actually work better as a movie than a book. What bothered me the most was the prose, the way it feels the need to over explain and lay everything out there word by word, instead of giving the reader more credit, throw in some subtext or subtlety.
5.2/10 from 5 reviews
by George RR Martin
Blood runs truer than oaths. The Seven Kingdoms are divided by revolt and blood feud as winter approaches like an angry beast. In the northern wastes a horde of hungry, sav [...]
Our rating: 9.9 | 5 positive reader reviews